Specs
- New or used
- Used
- Availability
- In stock
- Colour
- Black Pearl
- Available colours
- Red (Pro-RMK® graphics)Manufacturer spec
- Displacement
- 795 ccManufacturer spec
- Cylinders
- 2Manufacturer spec
- Cooling
- Liquid-cooledManufacturer spec
- Mileage
- 1,459 mi
- Dry weight
- 417 lbManufacturer specDealer: 417 lbs. (189.1 kg)
- Model code
- S14CG8GSL
- VIN
- SN1CG8GS4EC014923
- Stock #
- U014923
All details from the dealer (14)
- Model Type
- Deep Snow
Dimensions
- Length
- 129 in. (327.7 cm)Manufacturer spec
- Height
- 51 in. (129.5 cm)Manufacturer spec
- Width
- 46.5 in. (118.1 cm)Manufacturer spec
Engine & Drivetrain
- Bore x Stroke
- 85 x 70 mmManufacturer spec
- Carburetion
- Cleanfire® injectionManufacturer spec
- Ignition
- Electric startManufacturer spec
- Clutch
- Drive: P-85Driven: TEAM® LWTManufacturer spec
- Exhaust
- SC VES, singleManufacturer spec
- Brakes
- QuickDrive? low inertiaManufacturer spec
Operational
- Skis
- GripperManufacturer spec
- Ski Stance
- 39 / 40 / 41 in. (99.1 / 101.6 / 104.1 cm)Manufacturer spec
- Track LxWxH
- 155 x 15 x 2.4 in. Series 5.1Manufacturer spec
Suspension
- Suspension
- Front: PRO-RIDE? RMK® adjustable; Walker Evans® shocks; & track shock; 9 in. (22.9 cm) travelRear: RMK® coil-over; Walker Evans® track shock; 16 in. (40.6 cm) travelManufacturer spec
From the dealer's page
Lightest. Strongest. Most Flickable. The nimble performance of the perfectly balanced Polaris PRO-RMK® has allowed riders to elevate their game and go places others thought impossible and see the mountain like never before. It’s where the word flickability was invented.
Price history
Tracked since Oct 12, 2026 · last checked 3h ago
Price details as printed by the dealer
- Price$4,500
Throttle does not add these up.
- AUBURN EXTREME POWERSPORTS (this listing)
Prices as listed by dealers; auction results labelled; a dashed gap = no listed price.
Timeline
First seen
Oct 12, 2026
Market context
Comp set: 2012–2016 Polaris 800 PRO-RMK 155 ES · 1 listing
Fewer than three comparable units are indexed, so there is no honest median to compare against yet. We would rather show nothing than a number we cannot stand behind.